ThisIsMyUserName's Page

More from ThisIsMyUserName

Forum Posts

Comments

Posted on: Moon Landings Faked?
at 11/07/2009 12:08pm

This subject is personal opinion based off knowledge (to the experience), or lack of. My only question is, why hasn't ... more(+)

This subject is personal opinion based off knowledge (to the experience), or lack of. My only question is, why hasn't the USA, or any other country landed there since? Has our technology decreased over the years..? It merely can't be a financial problem either, so maybe we didn't land on the moon, but maybe we did - like someone already stated, if it is a conspiracy it can't be hidden forever. close(-)

Posted on: Wormholes....
at 11/07/2009 11:12am

Thanks for all your reply's. I understand the authors point now... So, in conclusion is it safe to say that; In the ... more(+)

Thanks for all your reply's. I understand the authors point now... So, in conclusion is it safe to say that; In the universe nothing is real, everything is continuous (however), including time.. ? Especially when quantum mechanics is thrown into the mix lol? Some brain numbing stuff to ponder though. Special thanks to yevaud for his/her clear explanations, and understanding my shoddy questioning very much appreciated close(-)

Posted on: Wormholes....
at 11/03/2009 9:35pm

I understand you would travel trough time like that, makes sense with time dilation, but I don't understand how he says ... more(+)

yevaud wrote:Well...

As the argument goes, if you were to create a stable wormhole - we'll assume this is possible, for the sake of argument - and then sent one end of it through space at a significant fraction of the speed of light, the two different end-points would be in two entirely different times. This is as the stationary end is still in "our" time, while the end-point that has been moved has experienced time-dilation. So if you were to step into the stationary end, and travel to the end that had been moved, you would effectively travel through time.

See what I mean?

I understand you would travel trough time like that, makes sense with time dilation, but I don't understand how he says you could arrive back at A after you got to B if A is stationary and B needs to be created - Isn't there a flaw in that?.... and B had to be built from A... If you catch my drift. (sorry i edited this a couple times, I am in a rush and i have to go I will be back shortly thanks for your time ) close(-)

Posted on: Wormholes....
at 11/03/2009 9:27pm

significant fraction you mean 99.99999999% speed of light or something?

Posted on: Wormholes....
at 11/03/2009 9:25pm

He also mentions something along the lines of that... If you could capture the "antimatter/gravity/i'm ... more(+)

He also mentions something along the lines of that... If you could capture the "antimatter/gravity/i'm confused" and bring it back from where you captured it you could essentially have a wormhole given to travel back in time the amount that was spent creating it? Wormholes (in theory) also contain no mass because of negative energy or because they cancel out all ? I am sorry about my unintelligible knowledge on this, it's all very new to me. Just curious.... close(-)

This user has not commented on any articles or features...